- Our approach
- Evaluation methods
- Examples
- Staffing
Our approach to evaluative studies
PEG conducts independent and objective evaluations which are designed to meet the specific needs of clients, including:
- evaluations that are continuous through the life of a programme, feeding back data that can modify policy delivery to make it more effective
- mid-term evaluations
- post projects evaluations
Evaluation methods
PEG uses a wide range of research methods in evaluation, these include:
- quantitative and qualitative methods
- experimental and non-experimental designs
- descriptive and experiential methods
- theory based approaches, research synthesis methods
- economic evaluation methods
Examples of recent evaluations
Some examples of Policy Evaluation Group's recent evaluations include:
- Evaluation of Pioneer Areas Project in South Yorkshire, Voluntary Action Sheffield
- BME Older People's Joint Service Initiative – Analysis and Evaluation of Current Strategies, Black Community Forum, Sheffield City Council, and four Sheffield Primary Care Trusts
- Evaluation of The Community Engagement Project, Burngreave New Deal for Communities(BNDfC)
- Swinton Community Partnership Mid-Term Evaluation, Swinton Community Partnership, Rotherham
- Tackling Work-Life Balance in Partnership, Northern College and Children Mean Business
Staffing
PEG benefits from being able to draw upon its directors, with their extensive academic and policy research expertise, and a range of associate consultants with specific technical skills in experimental and non-experimental designs; descriptive and experiential methods; theory based approaches; research synthesis methods; and economic evaluation methods. This ensures that is able to deliver the right product to meet clients' needs.